Justice on Autopilot? How AI is Reshaping the Legal System

As artificial intelligence weaves deeper into the fabric of our society, even the hallowed halls of justice are not immune. From sentencing decisions to legal research, AI is playing a rapidly expanding role in how justice is interpreted, delivered, and questioned.

One of the most controversial uses of AI in the courtroom involves risk assessment tools. Algorithms like COMPAS are used in some jurisdictions to evaluate the likelihood that a defendant will reoffend. While designed to bring objectivity, critics argue these tools can reinforce existing biases, especially against minorities.

Meanwhile, AI-powered platforms such as Harvey AI and LexisNexis are helping lawyers draft briefs, analyze case law, and generate arguments in record time. This legal automation is revolutionizing law firms but also raising concerns over confidentiality and overreliance on machines.

In some parts of the world, small claims courts are experimenting with AI to suggest outcomes in civil disputes. While still under human oversight, these experiments point to a future where AI may act as a co-judge or even a full arbitrator in low-stakes cases.

But with power comes responsibility. Legal scholars and advocacy groups are increasingly vocal about the need for transparency in how these algorithms are built and used. Who audits these tools? Who is responsible when an AI gets it wrong? And are defendants being treated fairly when judged by an algorithm?

As June decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court draw national focus to legal fairness, it's the perfect time to reflect on the role of AI in justice. Can it level the playing field—or will it deepen existing inequalities?

As always, technology is only as fair as the humans who design and deploy it. The challenge ahead is ensuring that justice not only seems impartial—but remains humane.